[Autom. eng. transl.] Two interesting decisions of the Court of Milan (which recognizes the non-pecuniary damage in the case of hardship suffered as a result of injections that exceeded the tolerability threshold, identifying an inviolable constitutionally protected right) and the Court of Rimini (which denies, instead, the non-pecuniary damage, after having declared the termination of the contract due to serious breach).
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] Immissions and betrayed savings: divergent applications of the constitutional reading of non-pecuniary damage|
|Number of pages||3|
|Journal||DANNO E RESPONSABILITÀ|
|Publication status||Published - 2008|