Immissioni e risparmio tradito: applicazioni divergenti della lettura costituzionale del danno non patrimoniale

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Immissions and betrayed savings: divergent applications of the constitutional reading of non-pecuniary damage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] Two interesting decisions of the Court of Milan (which recognizes the non-pecuniary damage in the case of hardship suffered as a result of injections that exceeded the tolerability threshold, identifying an inviolable constitutionally protected right) and the Court of Rimini (which denies, instead, the non-pecuniary damage, after having declared the termination of the contract due to serious breach).
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Immissions and betrayed savings: divergent applications of the constitutional reading of non-pecuniary damage
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)85-87
Number of pages3
JournalDANNO E RESPONSABILITÀ
Volume2008
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • danno

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Immissions and betrayed savings: divergent applications of the constitutional reading of non-pecuniary damage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this