Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] Two interesting decisions of the Court of Milan (which recognizes the non-pecuniary damage in the case of hardship suffered as a result of injections that exceeded the tolerability threshold, identifying an inviolable constitutionally protected right) and the Court of Rimini (which denies, instead, the non-pecuniary damage, after having declared the termination of the contract due to serious breach).
Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Immissions and betrayed savings: divergent applications of the constitutional reading of non-pecuniary damage |
---|---|
Original language | Italian |
Pages (from-to) | 85-87 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | DANNO E RESPONSABILITÀ |
Volume | 2008 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- danno