Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The sent. cost. n. 23 of 2015 declared the constitutional illegitimacy of art. 459 paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in the part in which the plaintiff is entitled to oppose, in the case of offenses prosecuted to a lawsuit, to the definition of the procedure with the issuance of a penal sentence for conviction. However, the decision of the judges of the Consulta does not seem to represent a constitutionally obliged choice, in the light of the ever-increasing attention that the legislator (also in the thrust of supranational sources) dedicates to the injured person, who is now recognized as having an increasingly important participatory role in the criminal trial
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The plaintiff's veto to the criminal conviction: privilege or participation of the victim? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 99-109 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | L'INDICE PENALE |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Decreto penale di condanna
- Persona offesa dal reato
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The plaintiff's veto to the criminal conviction: privilege or participation of the victim?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver