Il veto del querelante al decreto penale di condanna: privilegio o partecipazione della vittima?

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The plaintiff's veto to the criminal conviction: privilege or participation of the victim?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The sent. cost. n. 23 of 2015 declared the constitutional illegitimacy of art. 459 paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in the part in which the plaintiff is entitled to oppose, in the case of offenses prosecuted to a lawsuit, to the definition of the procedure with the issuance of a penal sentence for conviction. However, the decision of the judges of the Consulta does not seem to represent a constitutionally obliged choice, in the light of the ever-increasing attention that the legislator (also in the thrust of supranational sources) dedicates to the injured person, who is now recognized as having an increasingly important participatory role in the criminal trial
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The plaintiff's veto to the criminal conviction: privilege or participation of the victim?
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)99-109
Number of pages11
JournalL'INDICE PENALE
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Decreto penale di condanna
  • Persona offesa dal reato

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The plaintiff's veto to the criminal conviction: privilege or participation of the victim?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this