Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] 1. The question: the role of Incoterms in identifying the place of delivery of the goods «on the basis of the contract» pursuant to art. 7 no. 1 lit. b of the Brussels I-bis regulation. – 2. The ordinance of the United Sections of 28 June 2022 n. 20633. - 3. The substantive logic of the special forum of contractual matters. – 4. Substantive nature of place of performance agreements: their inconsistency with choice of court agreements; their subjection, also for the purposes of jurisdiction, to the rules governing the substance of the relationship. – 5. Verification of consent to the incorporation of an Incoterm and reconstruction of the meaning of the will thus expressed: the perspective of conflicts of laws. – 6. Continued. The perspective of the Vienna Convention on the sale of movable property. – 7. The conditions for the effectiveness of the agreement according to the Cassation: the requirement of "clarity". – 8. Incompatibility of the Cassation's approach with the indications obtainable from the Zelger, Car Trim and Electrosteel judgments of the Court of Justice. – 9. Concluding remarks.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The role of Incoterms in the conventional determination of the place of delivery: critical notes on the jurisprudence of the Cassation |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 562-590 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | RIVISTA DI DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE PRIVATO E PROCESSUALE |
| Volume | 58 |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Sale of goods
- Competenza giurisdizionale
- Compravendita di beni
- Jurisdiction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The role of Incoterms in the conventional determination of the place of delivery: critical notes on the jurisprudence of the Cassation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver