The work concerns the ordinance n. 19598 of 2020 of the Supreme Court, that proposed a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Luxembourg asking three questions, the first of which concerns the compliance with EU law of the interpretative practice of art. 111, paragraph 8, of the Constitution, endorsed by the Constitutional Court and not shared by the Supreme Court. The ordinance highlights a new conflict between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, particularly delicate as regards the interpretation of the constitutional text and could also compromise the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the Court of Justice, a relationship that has already experienced several moments of tension in recent years.
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] The preliminary reference to the Court of Justice as an attempt by the Supreme Court to overcome the interpretation of art. 111, paragraph 8, of the Constitution, provided by the Council. In the margin of the Ordinance of the Joint Sections n. 19598 of 2020.|
|Number of pages||21|
|Journal||FORUM DI QUADERNI COSTITUZIONALI RASSEGNA|
|Publication status||Published - 2021|
- giurisdizione interpretazione costituzionale rinvio pregiudiziale