Il problema del rapporto tra "leggi costituzionalmente necessarie" e "leggi a contenuto costituzionalmente vincolato" nella giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The problem of the relationship between "constitutionally necessary laws" and "laws with a constitutionally bound content" in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The essay reconstructs the conceptual distinction between constitutionally necessary laws and constitutionally bounded laws, and investigates its relevance in the systematic implicit limits to the admissibility of the abrogative referendum
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The problem of the relationship between "constitutionally necessary laws" and "laws with a constitutionally bound content" in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)729-761
Number of pages33
JournalQUADERNI REGIONALI
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Ammissibilità
  • Contenuto costituzionalmente vincolato
  • Leggi
  • Referendum - limiti impliciti

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The problem of the relationship between "constitutionally necessary laws" and "laws with a constitutionally bound content" in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this