Abstract
The essay offers some brief introductory remarks on the balancing of legal
principles, and the test of proportionality, in constitutional adjudication. It
submits a working definition of balancing and brings to light its normative
and cultural roots in the Italian system. It also recalls some criticism and alternative
proposals in Italian scholarship and distinguishes balancing from
similar but separate concepts (reasonableness of legal classifications, teleologic
construction, selection of adequate legal substitutes for unconstitutional
provisions). Conclusively, some practical suggestions are given, including
for cases where also the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European
Convention on Human Rights are relevant.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The balancing judgment: a case-oriented constitutional jurisprudence? Introductory notes |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 83-105 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | LO STATO |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Bilanciamento
- Diritto costituzionale
- Giustizia costituzionale
- Proporzionalità
- Ragionevolezza
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The balancing judgment: a case-oriented constitutional jurisprudence? Introductory notes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver