Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The paper analyzes the critical issues and prospects for reforms in financial criminal law, with particular reference to the cases of abuse of privileged information and market manipulation. Starting from the dialogue between the national and European Courts, the Author criticizes the sanctioning superfetation constructed by the legislator through the double criminal / administrative track, while maintaining that the solution to the weaknesses noted in the Grande Stevens v. Italy, with regard to compliance with the ne bis in idem principle, must be provided through a specific legislative reform, since a satisfactory exegetical approach cannot be reached on the basis of domestic law alone.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The double track of sanctions in market abuse crimes: criticalities and perspectives |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Title of host publication | Crimine organizzato e criminalità economica. Tendenze empirico-criminologiche e strumenti normativi di contrasto nella prospettiva del diritto dell'unione europea |
| Pages | 211-248 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Giurisprudenza sovranazionale
- abusi di mercato
- doppio binario sanzionatorio
- testo unico della finanza
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The double track of sanctions in market abuse crimes: criticalities and perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver