Il doppio binario sanzionatorio nei reati di market abuse: criticità e prospettive

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The double track of sanctions in market abuse crimes: criticalities and perspectives

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The paper analyzes the critical issues and prospects for reforms in financial criminal law, with particular reference to the cases of abuse of privileged information and market manipulation. Starting from the dialogue between the national and European Courts, the Author criticizes the sanctioning superfetation constructed by the legislator through the double criminal / administrative track, while maintaining that the solution to the weaknesses noted in the Grande Stevens v. Italy, with regard to compliance with the ne bis in idem principle, must be provided through a specific legislative reform, since a satisfactory exegetical approach cannot be reached on the basis of domestic law alone.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The double track of sanctions in market abuse crimes: criticalities and perspectives
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationCrimine organizzato e criminalità economica. Tendenze empirico-criminologiche e strumenti normativi di contrasto nella prospettiva del diritto dell'unione europea
Pages211-248
Number of pages38
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Giurisprudenza sovranazionale
  • abusi di mercato
  • doppio binario sanzionatorio
  • testo unico della finanza

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The double track of sanctions in market abuse crimes: criticalities and perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this