Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Il (disturbo da) gioco d’azzardo tra politica e magistratura

Translated title of the contribution: Gambling (disorder) between politics and the judiciary
  • Renato Balduzzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Until ten years ago, the Italian law regulation of gambling showed a more and more thick plot betweenbetween the market interests to rise profit and the public interest of the State to regulate this sector with aims\r\nof criminal contrast and tax revenue’s growth. A turning point is represented by the reform of 2012, when the\r\nState legislator has recognized the need to reverse that trend, giving a stronger importance, in the balance of\r\ninterests underlying the regulation of the sector, to the health protection, in the light of the growing andworrying consequences for health that the expansion of the legal gambling market was causing. This passage has led to a change of approach both in the legislation and in the case law, on whose trajectories, however, partial or discordant readings coexist in the law literature today. The essay aims to recompose in an overall reading these trajectories. The analysis will allow us to grasp a substantial stability of the “turning point” of\r\n2012, even in the midst of many conflicting pressures that have characterized the regulatory interventions andthe judges’ decisions of the last decade
Translated title of the contributionGambling (disorder) between politics and the judiciary
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)133-158
Number of pages26
JournalRivista Italiana di Medicina Legale e del Diritto in Campo Sanitario
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • gambling disease
  • gioco d'azzardo patologico

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gambling (disorder) between politics and the judiciary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this