Il danno non patrimoniale giuslavorista è diverso da quello "generale"?

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Is the non-pecuniary labor damage different from the "general" one?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The greater generosity with which the remedy of non-pecuniary damage is applied in the labor law sector with the recognition of individual items of non-pecuniary damage and how this raises profiles of uniformity and equality is analyzed. In other sectors, however, non-pecuniary damage is excluded, in a manner consistent with the indications of the United Sections for the defect of a constitutional contra jus.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Is the non-pecuniary labor damage different from the "general" one?
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1087-1088
Number of pages2
JournalDANNO E RESPONSABILITÀ
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • ambito giuslavoristico
  • danno non patrimoniale
  • risarcimento del danno

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Is the non-pecuniary labor damage different from the "general" one?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this