[Autom. eng. transl.] The comment concerns the issue of non-pecuniary damage, in relation to which it is stated that it does not exist in the event of damage to the right to leisure; instead, it can be configured in the hypothesis of stress due to the search for the illegally removed vehicle, provided that the stress is ascertained.
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] Bagatellar non-pecuniary damage: three decisions|
|Number of pages||3|
|Journal||RESPONSABILITÀ CIVILE E PREVIDENZA|
|Publication status||Published - 2011|
- danno non patrimoniale
- tempo libero