Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Il contratto "monofirma" e le Sezioni Unite della Cassazione. Un dialogo a più voci

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The "single signature" contract and the United Sections of the Cassation. A dialogue with several voices
  • Andrea Perrone*
  • , Francesco Denozza*
  • , Aurelio Mirone*
  • , Danilo Semeghini*
  • , Lara Modica*
  • , Roberto Natoli*
    • *Corresponding author

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The present debate takes cue from the recent ruling of the Joint Divisions of the Supreme Court of Cassation, which have addressed the issue of the validity of the investment services framework contract that has been produced in a civil trial and is signed by only one party - namely, by the client. Scholars from different disciplines participate in such debate.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The "single signature" contract and the United Sections of the Cassation. A dialogue with several voices
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalORIZZONTI DEL DIRITTO COMMERCIALE
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Form of the contract
  • Invalidity
  • Investment services framework contract
  • “Single signature” contract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The "single signature" contract and the United Sections of the Cassation. A dialogue with several voices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint

Cite this