Il "caso ex-Ilva" alla luce della riforma degli articoli 9 e 41 Cost. e delle pronunce delle Corti di Strasburgo e di Giustizia UE

The essay returns to reflect on the case of the Taranto steelmaking hub, which has been under the spotlight of ordinary justice - civil and criminal justice - for years, due to the negative consequences of production activity on the environment and the health of workers and residents. In consideration of the importance of the plant, for the type of production and for the high number of employees, the Government has intervened several times, starting from the "save Ilva" decree of 2012, in an attempt to safeguard the continuity of the production activity and employment. What followed was the involvement of the Constitutional Court, called to verify the legitimacy of a difficult balance between different constitutional interests, as well as the European Court of Human Rights and, lastly, the Court of Justice. This work intends, on the one hand, to verify whether the reform of the articles. 9 and 41 of the Constitution can affect the results of a new balance between constitutional values and, on the other hand, to evaluate the impact of the recent rulings of the Strasbourg Court and the Court of Justice.