Abstract
In this paper I argue against Etchemendy's critque to Tarskian conception of Logical consequence. I shall take into account the case of second-order logical truth which are supposed to be dependent on other extra-logical facts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 71-88 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | LA NUOVA CRITICA. NUOVA SERIE |
| Volume | 2012 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Higher Order Logic
- John Etchemendy
- Logical Consequence
- Logical Truth