GVHD occurrence does not reduce AML relapse following PTCy-based haploidentical transplantation: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT

Frédéric Baron, Myriam Labopin, Johanna Tischer, Anna Maria Raiola, Jan Vydra, Didier Blaise, Patrizia Chiusolo, Friedrich Stölzel, Renato Fanin, Patrice Chevallier, Arnon Nagler, Fabio Ciceri, Mohamad Mohty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The association between graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurrence and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse in patients treated with HLA-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis has remained debated. Here, we addressed this issue in patients with active AML at transplantation. 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 49% and 32.3%, respectively. There were no associations between acute nor chronic GVHD of any grade and lower relapse incidence. However, grade I acute GVHD was associated with better LFS (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–0.99, P = 0.04). In contrast, grade III–IV acute (HR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.87–5.12, P < 0.0001) as well as extensive chronic (HR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.81–6.04, P = 0.0001) GVHD correlated with higher nonrelapse mortality leading to lower LFS (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.99–1.86, P = 0.056 and HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.35–2.89, P = 0.0004, respectively). In conclusion, these data suggest a dissociation of graft-versus-leukemia effects from GVHD in patients with active AML treated with PTCy-based Haplo-HCT.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)N/A-N/A
JournalJOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY &amp; ONCOLOGY
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • AML
  • Acute myeloid leukemia
  • HLA-haploidentical
  • Mismatched unrelated donor
  • PTCy
  • Post-transplant cyclophosphamide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GVHD occurrence does not reduce AML relapse following PTCy-based haploidentical transplantation: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this