TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services
AU - Bragard, Claude
AU - Caffier, David
AU - Candresse, Thierry
AU - Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
AU - Dehnen Schmutz, Katharina
AU - Gilioli, Gianni
AU - Grégoire, Jean Claude
AU - Miret, Josep Anton Jaques
AU - Jeger, Michael
AU - Macleod, Alan
AU - Navajas Navarro, Maria
AU - Niere, Bjoern
AU - Parnell, Stephen
AU - Potting, Roel
AU - Rafoss, Trond
AU - Rossi, Vittorio
AU - Urek, Gregor
AU - Van Bruggen, Ariena
AU - Van Der Werf, Wopke
AU - West, Jonathan
AU - Winter, Stephan
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Maintaining a healthy environment and conserving biodiversity are major goals of environmental
protection. A challenge is that protection goals outlined in legislation are often too general and broad to
be directly applicable for environmental risk assessment (ERA) performed by EFSA. Therefore, they need
to be translated into specific protection goals (SPGs). This Guidance presents a framework, which
accounts for biodiversity and ecosystem services, to make general protection goals operational for use in
all areas of EFSA’s ERAs. The approach to follow has three sequential steps: (1) the identification of
relevant ecosystem services; (2) the identification of service providing units (SPUs) for these ecosystem
services; and (3) the specification of options for the level/parameters of protection of the SPUs using five
interrelated dimensions. This last step involves the specification of options for the ecological entity and
attribute to protect and the magnitude, temporal scale and spatial scale of the biologically relevant and,
in the case of regulated products, tolerable effects, the latter defined in dialogue with risk managers. In
order to promote transparency and consistency when developing options for the level/parameters of
protection, this guidance provides considerations to justify the selected options.
AB - Maintaining a healthy environment and conserving biodiversity are major goals of environmental
protection. A challenge is that protection goals outlined in legislation are often too general and broad to
be directly applicable for environmental risk assessment (ERA) performed by EFSA. Therefore, they need
to be translated into specific protection goals (SPGs). This Guidance presents a framework, which
accounts for biodiversity and ecosystem services, to make general protection goals operational for use in
all areas of EFSA’s ERAs. The approach to follow has three sequential steps: (1) the identification of
relevant ecosystem services; (2) the identification of service providing units (SPUs) for these ecosystem
services; and (3) the specification of options for the level/parameters of protection of the SPUs using five
interrelated dimensions. This last step involves the specification of options for the ecological entity and
attribute to protect and the magnitude, temporal scale and spatial scale of the biologically relevant and,
in the case of regulated products, tolerable effects, the latter defined in dialogue with risk managers. In
order to promote transparency and consistency when developing options for the level/parameters of
protection, this guidance provides considerations to justify the selected options.
KW - Protection goals
KW - environmental risk assessmen t
KW - feed additives
KW - genetically modified organisms
KW - invasive alien species
KW - protection products
KW - Protection goals
KW - environmental risk assessmen t
KW - feed additives
KW - genetically modified organisms
KW - invasive alien species
KW - protection products
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/93691
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4499
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4499
M3 - Article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 50
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
ER -