Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The essay examines the way in which, in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, art. 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (on the subject of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment) has begun to be read not only as a source of prohibitions for States, but also as a source of positive obligations.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The positive obligations inherent in the prohibition of torture in the interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 191-221 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | ANNALI DELL'UNIVERSITÀ DI FERRARA. NUOVA SERIE. SEZIONE 5: SCIENZE GIURIDICHE |
| Volume | 20 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Diritto internazionale pubblico
- Public international law
- Tortura
- Torture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The positive obligations inherent in the prohibition of torture in the interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver