Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The publication deals with highlighting the role of the national judge in the procedure of recovery of an illegitimate State aid. The relevant Community case law provides that the full reimbursement of unlawful state aid must, in principle, be imposed by the national court; he must order the recovery simply if the measure has not been notified, that is in the case in which the aid is illegal and does not enter the examination of the compatibility of the measure with art. 107, nos. 2 and 3 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The evaluation concerning the compatibility of the measure is, in fact, the exclusive task of the European Commission which, with the exception of exceptions, orders recovery only after having checked and denied the compatibility of the measure. However, the Community courts have stated that the obligation of recovery of national courts is not absolute, by virtue of the fact that exceptional circumstances occur.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Public aid to undertakings: exceptional circumstances justifying the limitation by national courts of the obligation to repay incompatible aid |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1286-1292 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo |
| Volume | 2010 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- aiuto di stato
- aiuto incompatibile
- obbligo di recupero
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Public aid to undertakings: exceptional circumstances justifying the limitation by national courts of the obligation to repay incompatible aid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver