Abstract
The paper reflects on the fact that, despite the importance of the 2022 Cartabia reform in criminal matters, the de facto retributive model that connotes the once again unchanged range of main criminal sanctions remains unsurpassed. Within this framework, signs of novelty are noted, how-ever, especially in connection with a timid opening towards the biphasic process in the application of the new substitute sanctions. It is also analysed the role that comes to assume, in the described framework, the novelty constituted by the attribution of importance, as a result of the Cartabia reform, to restorative justice programmes, considering their relations with the re-educative purpose attributed by the Constitution to the instruments of response to crimes.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Punitive justice and restorative justice: what relationships? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- giustizia riparativa
- Restorative justice - Reform of the criminal sanctioning system - Biphasic process – Re-educative purpose of punishment.
- riforma del sistema sanzionatorio penale
- processo bifasico
- finalità rieducativa della pena.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Punitive justice and restorative justice: what relationships?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver