Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] Historically, the discussion of the subject of replacing the civil judge with the administration has been affected by the heterogeneity of the cases, which is very difficult to identify as a unit; perhaps it was also affected by another limit: the problem was identified for too long with the interpretation of the so-called internal limits of Annex E to l. 20 March 1865, n. 2248. This identification, however, appears to be excessive and on the other hand a limitative one. The present work, inspired by a survey on the different hypotheses of "replacement" of the judge to the administration, is finalized to grasp the evolutionary profiles of the question.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Ordinary judge and "replacement" of the administration |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 741-766 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI DIRITTO E PROCEDURA CIVILE |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- giudice ordinario
- pubblica amministrazione
- riserva di amministrazione
- sostituzione