Abstract
The terms multimorbidity and frailty are increasingly used in the medical literature to measure the risk profile of an older individual in order to support clinical decisions and design ad hoc interventions. The construct of multimorbidity was initially developed and used in nongeriatric settings. It generates a monodimensional nosological risk profile, grounding its roots in the somewhat inadequate framework of disease. On the other hand, frailty is a geriatric concept that implies a more exhaustive and comprehensive assessment of the individual and his/her environment, facilitating the implementation of multidimensional and tailored interventions. This article aims to promote among geriatricians the use of terms that may better enhance their background and provide more value to their unrivaled expertise in caring for biologically aged persons.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 361-364 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Nursing
- Health Policy
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
Keywords
- Diseases
- aging
- comprehensive geriatric assessment
- public health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Frailty and Multimorbidity: Different Ways of Thinking About Geriatrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver