TY - JOUR
T1 - Forensic value of genetic variants associated with anti‐social behavior
AU - Oliva, Antonio
AU - Grassi, Simone
AU - Zedda, Massimo
AU - Molinari, Marco
AU - Ferracuti, Stefano
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Insanity defense is sometimes invoked in criminal cases, and its demonstration is usually based on a multifactorial contribution of behavioural, clinical, and neurological elements. Neuro-radiological evidence of structural alterations in cerebral areas that involve decision‐making and moral reasoning is often accepted as a useful tool in these evaluations. On the other hand, the genetic predisposition to anti‐social behavior is still controversial. In this paper, we describe two cases of violent crimes committed by young carriers of genetic variants associated with personality disorder; both the defendants claimed to be insane at the time of the crime. We discuss these cases and review the scientific literature regarding the relationship between legal incapaci-ty/predisposition to criminal behavior and genetic mutations. In conclusion, despite some genetic variants being able to influence several cognitive processes (like moral judgement and impulse control), there is currently no evidence that carriers of these mutations are, per se, incapable of intentionally committing crimes.
AB - Insanity defense is sometimes invoked in criminal cases, and its demonstration is usually based on a multifactorial contribution of behavioural, clinical, and neurological elements. Neuro-radiological evidence of structural alterations in cerebral areas that involve decision‐making and moral reasoning is often accepted as a useful tool in these evaluations. On the other hand, the genetic predisposition to anti‐social behavior is still controversial. In this paper, we describe two cases of violent crimes committed by young carriers of genetic variants associated with personality disorder; both the defendants claimed to be insane at the time of the crime. We discuss these cases and review the scientific literature regarding the relationship between legal incapaci-ty/predisposition to criminal behavior and genetic mutations. In conclusion, despite some genetic variants being able to influence several cognitive processes (like moral judgement and impulse control), there is currently no evidence that carriers of these mutations are, per se, incapable of intentionally committing crimes.
KW - Anti‐social behavior
KW - Behavioral genetics
KW - Crime
KW - Genetic predisposition
KW - Legal capacity
KW - Anti‐social behavior
KW - Behavioral genetics
KW - Crime
KW - Genetic predisposition
KW - Legal capacity
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/200972
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics11122386
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics11122386
M3 - Article
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 11
SP - 2386
EP - 2396
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
ER -