Abstract
In the last two decades, voluntary standards have played an increasing role in reshaping the non-GMO labeling\r\nschemes in the EU and the US. This work compares the mandatory and voluntary labeling schemes for food\r\nproduced from or with GMO in these two markets. After reviewing the EU and US regulatory frameworks, we\r\nintroduce the incentives for the implementation of private and public voluntary standards. We describe the\r\nexperiences of voluntary standards adoption by highlighting the development of non-GMO labeled products\r\nmarkets in EU and US. We emphasize the similarities between EU and US frameworks, the convergence between public and private standards, and identify the potential for future development of the non-GMO market. We conclude by describing the policy and economic implications of the development of the non-GMO labeled products markets and consequences of the regulation that will apply to crops derived by new genetic modification\r\ntechniques.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | N/A-N/A |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Food Policy |
| Issue number | N/A |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Food Science
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Keywords
- GMO
- Non-GMO regulation
- Private and public standards
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Food processor and retailer non-GMO standards in the US and EU and the driving role of regulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver