Fingolimod vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis

Matteo Lucchini, Assunta Bianco, Massimiliano Mirabella, Shalom Haggiag, Viviana Nociti, Luca Prosperini, Maria Chiara Buscarinu, Antonio Cortese, Laura De Giglio, Elisabetta Ferraro, Arianna Fornasiero, Ada Francia, Simonetta Galgani, Claudio Gasperini, Girolama Alessandra Marfia, Enrico Millefiorini, Simona Pontecorvo, Carlo Pozzilli, Serena Ruggieri, Eleonora Sgarlata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To directly compare fingolimod (FNG) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) on no evident disease activity (NEDA) status in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 7 multiple sclerosis outpatient clinics in Central Italy. Methods We analyzed data of patients with RRMS who started an oral agent, namely DMF or FNG, either as first treatment (naives) or after switching from self-injectable drugs (switchers). We performed a propensity score (PS)–based nearest-neighbor matching within a caliper of 0.05 to select patients with homogeneous baseline characteristics. Pairwise censoring was adopted to adjust for difference in length of follow-up between the 2 treatment groups. Comparisons were then conducted in matched samples with Cox models (stratified by center) with NEDA-3 as the main outcome. NEDA-3 was defined as no relapses, no disability worsening, and no MRI activity. Results Overall, 483 and 456 patients eligible for analysis started on FNG and DMF, respectively. The PS-matching procedure retained a total of 550 patients (275 per group). After a median on-study follow-up of 18 months, the proportions of patients with NEDA-3 were similar (FNG 73%, DMF 70%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, p = 0.078). Subgroup analyses showed a comparable effectiveness of the 2 drugs in naives (n = 170, HR 1.15, p = 0.689), whereas FNG was superior to DMF in the achievement of NEDA-3 status among switchers (n = 380, HR 0.57, p = 0.007). Conclusion We found no significant difference between FNG and DMF on NEDA-3 status, while subgroup analyses suggest the superiority of FNG over DMF in patients switching from self-injectable drugs. Classification of evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS, DMF and FNG have comparable efficacy in treatment-naive patients and that FNG is superior to DMF in patients switching from self-injectable drugs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10.1212/WNL.0000000000005772-N/A/A
JournalNeurology
Volume2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Multiple sclerosis, class IV, clinical trials observational studies (Cohort, case control)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fingolimod vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this