Filologia e dispute in età carolingia. Il ‘De una et non trina deitate’ di Incmaro di Reims

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Philology and disputes in the Carolingian age. The ‘De una et non trina deitate’ by Incmaro di Reims

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Lupus of Ferrières and Hincmar of Reims are presented, both Carolingian scholars of high calibre, equipped with philological methods. Their theological views were grounded on a keen study of the Church-Fathers and of oecumenical councils; for this purpose texts had to be absolutely correct. Hincmar confuted his enemies and the heretical position of Gottschalk of Orbais (†867/870) on the predestination and Trinity with support of many quotations from the Fathers; points in discussion included authenticity of a pseudo-Augustinian work and interpolated sentences in the acts of the Councile of Costantinople (A.D. 680-681). Philology was a mean of defense of orthodoxy and Veritas.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Philology and disputes in the Carolingian age. The ‘De una et non trina deitate’ by Incmaro di Reims
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationFilologia e società. Episodi e contesti lungo la storia
EditorsF Costa, F Gallo, S Martinelli Tempesta, M Petoletti
Pages83-101
Number of pages19
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Lessico filologico medievale
  • Incmaro di Reims

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Philology and disputes in the Carolingian age. The ‘De una et non trina deitate’ by Incmaro di Reims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this