Fecondazione eterologa: il passo (falso) della Corte costituzionale

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Heterologous fertilization: the (false) passage of the Constitutional Court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The Author highlights the numerous critical profiles of the sentence with which the Consultation has declared constitutionally illegitimate the articles. 4, c. 3, 9, c. 1 and 3, 12, c. 1 of the law of 19 February 2004, n. 40, excluding heterologous fertilization. It focuses in particular on the ambivalent attitude of the Constitutional Court with regard to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights; on the contradictory nature of self-determination related to the couple; on the unacceptability of the assimilation of heterologous fertilization to homologous fertilization, as well as on the essential distance of heterologous fertilization from adoption; on the call for a right to health "of the couple" that the art. 32 of the Constitution excludes when the "protection ... as a fundamental right of the individual".
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Heterologous fertilization: the (false) passage of the Constitutional Court
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1117-1126
Number of pages10
JournalEUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • adozione
  • autodeterminazione
  • diritto alla salute
  • fecondazione eterologa
  • fecondazione omologa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Heterologous fertilization: the (false) passage of the Constitutional Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this