TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility of Intraoperative Proctosigmoidoscopy After Discoid Bowel Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Pilot Multicenter Study
AU - Raimondo, Diego
AU - Ianieri, Manuel Maria
AU - Raffone, Antonio
AU - Ferla, Stefano
AU - Raspollini, Arianna
AU - Virgilio, Agnese
AU - Govoni, Francesca
AU - Pavone, Matteo
AU - Neola, Daniele
AU - Guida, Maurizio
AU - Del Governatore, Marco
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
AU - Seracchioli, Renato
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Study Objective: Although surgery is the gold standard treatment for pain refractory to medical management or partial occlusion owing to rectosigmoid endometriosis, surgical resection can be associated with major perioperative complications. From general surgery experience, intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy has shown encouraging results as a feasible, safe, and effective technique in reducing the risk of complications related to intestinal anastomosis after segmental resection. Unfortunately, there are no studies evaluating its role after discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Design: A pilot, multicentric, observational, prospective, cohort study. Setting: Two academic hospitals, from March 1 to December 31, 2022. Patients: We enrolled all consecutive fertile-age patients affected by symptomatic endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection. Inclusion criteria were (1) age between 18 and 50 years, (2) diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis performed by transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and (3) women scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection of endometriosis at low risk of segmental resection. Interventions: During data analysis, enrolled patients were divided into 2 study groups for comparisons based on whether or not the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy was performed upon surgeons' discretion after discoid resection for treating endometriosis, in addition to standard integrity tests. Primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success. Secondary study outcomes were the differences between the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group and the nonintraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group in (1) mean of total operative time and (2) rate of perioperative complications. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled and equally distributed in the 2 groups. The rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success was 86%. No significant difference was reported between the 2 groups in terms of total operative time (p = .1) and intraoperative and postoperative complications (p = .5 and p = 1, respectively), with no surgical complication related to intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy. Conclusion: Intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy seems as a feasible and non-time-consuming - time-consuming intraoperative procedure in women undergone discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Larger studies with longer follow-up period are necessary to confirm our findings and assess clinical benefits over standard procedure. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2024) 31, 680-687. - 687. (c) 2024 AAGL. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
AB - Study Objective: Although surgery is the gold standard treatment for pain refractory to medical management or partial occlusion owing to rectosigmoid endometriosis, surgical resection can be associated with major perioperative complications. From general surgery experience, intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy has shown encouraging results as a feasible, safe, and effective technique in reducing the risk of complications related to intestinal anastomosis after segmental resection. Unfortunately, there are no studies evaluating its role after discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Design: A pilot, multicentric, observational, prospective, cohort study. Setting: Two academic hospitals, from March 1 to December 31, 2022. Patients: We enrolled all consecutive fertile-age patients affected by symptomatic endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection. Inclusion criteria were (1) age between 18 and 50 years, (2) diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis performed by transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and (3) women scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection of endometriosis at low risk of segmental resection. Interventions: During data analysis, enrolled patients were divided into 2 study groups for comparisons based on whether or not the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy was performed upon surgeons' discretion after discoid resection for treating endometriosis, in addition to standard integrity tests. Primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success. Secondary study outcomes were the differences between the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group and the nonintraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group in (1) mean of total operative time and (2) rate of perioperative complications. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled and equally distributed in the 2 groups. The rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success was 86%. No significant difference was reported between the 2 groups in terms of total operative time (p = .1) and intraoperative and postoperative complications (p = .5 and p = 1, respectively), with no surgical complication related to intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy. Conclusion: Intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy seems as a feasible and non-time-consuming - time-consuming intraoperative procedure in women undergone discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Larger studies with longer follow-up period are necessary to confirm our findings and assess clinical benefits over standard procedure. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2024) 31, 680-687. - 687. (c) 2024 AAGL. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
KW - Anastomotic leakage
KW - Bowel complication
KW - Rectosigmoid endoscopy
KW - Minimally invasive surgery
KW - Integrity tests
KW - Anastomotic leakage
KW - Bowel complication
KW - Rectosigmoid endoscopy
KW - Minimally invasive surgery
KW - Integrity tests
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/292278
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.004
M3 - Article
SN - 1553-4650
VL - 31
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
ER -