Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fanfani al Ministero del Lavoro (1947-1950): lotta alla disoccupazione e regolazione pubblica

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Fanfani at the Ministry of Labor (1947-1950): fight against unemployment and public regulation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The essay deals with Amintore Fanfani’s activities as Minister or Labour and social welfare from 1947 to 1950, within the first centrist governments. The author examines the background of organization and legislation about public service of work placement, as well as the consultations and discussions that finally led to the controversial Italian Law no. 264 passed in 1949. It established some changes about starting employment and employment assistance for involuntary unemployed workers. This bill, which Fanfani was strongly in favour of, is often negatively stereotyped, ignoring that it was passed due to a compromise with the leftist parties. More in general, the essay highlights that the young politician, who came from the lecture rooms as a professor, left a dynamic mark on the Ministry of Labour and the employment and labor policies. The contribution has been originally published in "Bollettino dell'Archivio per la storia del movimento sociale cattolico in Italia", 2011 (1-2).
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Fanfani at the Ministry of Labor (1947-1950): fight against unemployment and public regulation
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationAmintore Fanfani. Formazione culturale, identità e responsabilità politica
EditorsALBERTO COVA, CLAUDIO BESANA
Pages263-308
Number of pages46
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Employment
  • Fanfani Amintore
  • Ministero del lavoro e della previdenza sociale
  • Ministry of labor and social welfare
  • Occupazione

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Fanfani at the Ministry of Labor (1947-1950): fight against unemployment and public regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this