Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evidence synthesis and guideline development in genomic medicine: current status and future prospects

  • Sheri D. Schully
  • , Tram Kim Lam
  • , W. David Dotson
  • , Christine Q. Chang
  • , Naomi Aronson
  • , Marian L. Birkeland
  • , Stephanie Jo Brewster
  • , Stefania Boccia
  • , Adam H. Buchanan
  • , Ned Calonge
  • , Kathleen Calzone
  • , Benjamin Djulbegovic
  • , Katrina A.B. Goddard
  • , Roger D. Klein
  • , Teri E. Klein
  • , Joseph Lau
  • , Rochelle Long
  • , Gary H. Lyman
  • , Rebecca L. Morgan
  • , Christina G.S. Palmer
  • Mary V. Relling, Wendy S. Rubinstein, Jesse J. Swen, Sharon F. Terry, Marc S. Williams, Muin J. Khoury
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • Duke University
  • Colorado Trust
  • University of South Florida
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Stanford University
  • Brown University
  • The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • St. Jude Children Research Hospital
  • Leiden University
  • Genetic Alliance
  • Geisinger Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose:With the accelerated implementation of genomic medicine, health-care providers will depend heavily on professional guidelines and recommendations. Because genomics affects many diseases across the life span, no single professional group covers the entirety of this rapidly developing field.Methods:To pursue a discussion of the minimal elements needed to develop evidence-based guidelines in genomics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Cancer Institute jointly held a workshop to engage representatives from 35 organizations with interest in genomics (13 of which make recommendations). The workshop explored methods used in evidence synthesis and guideline development and initiated a dialogue to compare these methods and to assess whether they are consistent with the Institute of Medicine report "Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust." Results:The participating organizations that develop guidelines or recommendations all had policies to manage guideline development and group membership, and processes to address conflicts of interests. However, there was wide variation in the reliance on external reviews, regular updating of recommendations, and use of systematic reviews to assess the strength of scientific evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-67
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • development
  • evidence synthesis
  • genomic medicine
  • guideline

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence synthesis and guideline development in genomic medicine: current status and future prospects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this