Abstract
We examined the validity and utility of the DSM-5 severity ratings for anorexia nervosa (AN) in a clinical (treatment-seeking) sample (N = 273; 95.6% women). Participants classified with mild, moderate, severe, and extreme severity of AN based on their measured body mass index, differed significantly from each other in eating disorder features, putative maintenance factors, and illness-specific functional impairment (medium effect sizes). However, they were statistically indistinguishable in psychiatric-disorder comorbidity and distress, demographics, and age-of-AN onset. The implications of our findings, providing limited support for the DSM-5 severity ratings for AN, and directions for future research are outlined.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 124-128 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Psychiatry Research |
| Volume | 262 |
| Issue number | 262 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Biological Psychiatry
Keywords
- Biological Psychiatry
- Eating psychopathology
- Functional impairment
- Psychiatric comorbidity
- Psychiatry and Mental Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the DSM-5 severity ratings for anorexia nervosa in a clinical sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver