Espulsione dello straniero: la Cassazione difende il “nucleo irriducibile” del diritto alla salute del disabile.

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Expulsion of the foreigner: the Cassation defends the "irreducible nucleus" of the disabled person's right to health.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The Supreme College is called upon to express itself on the correct interpretation of some provisions of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998, "Consolidated text of the provisions concerning immigration regulations and rules on the status of foreigners". The question brought to the attention of the judges of legitimacy concerns, in particular, the presumed taxability of the hypotheses impeding the expulsion of the foreigner from the territory of the State, as an alternative sanction to the detention of the condemned (articles 16, paragraph 5, and 19 you imm.). From the very beginning of the motivation, which precedes the annulment by postponing the order that had decided on the order of expulsion of a disabled detainee, the Court calls the merit judge to observe principles and values much higher than he leaves to predict the hermeneutical problem under discussion: the scope of the right to health, the protection of physical disability, the recognition of the dignity of vulnerable people.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Expulsion of the foreigner: the Cassation defends the "irreducible nucleus" of the disabled person's right to health.
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1557-1568
Number of pages12
JournalRivista Italiana di Medicina Legale e del Diritto in Campo Sanitario
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Categorie vulnerabili
  • Dignità
  • Diritto alla salute
  • Disabilità
  • Divieto di espulsione
  • Espulsione dello straniero
  • Immigrazione
  • Interpretazione tassativa
  • Sanzione alternativa alla detenzione

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Expulsion of the foreigner: the Cassation defends the "irreducible nucleus" of the disabled person's right to health.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this