Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The code of the business crisis modifies for the third time, a few months after the interpolations of the ln161 of 2017 and of the Legislative Decree n.21 of 2018, the art.104 bis disp. att.cpp The intention to remedy the interpretative doubts of the previous changes regarding the execution of the preventive seizure pursuant to art. 321 cpp, judicial administration of goods and protection of third parties is commendable. The results once again do not satisfy and confirm that the effectiveness of yet another "corrective" intervention, without an overall vision, is "compromised" by the contingent need to reduce the competence in the matter of the National Goods Agency Seized and Confiscated, which, rather, should be put in a position with adequate human, financial and structural resources to perform its fundamental function of administering and allocating the assets subject to the bond. At the same time, the desire to strengthen the protection of third parties affected by the kidnapping already within the cognition process is confirmed, also in this case without tackling the issue in an organic way.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Execution of preventive seizure, judicial administration of assets and protection of third parties. An "endless" reform of art. 104 bis available att. cpp |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1350-1361 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | DIRITTO PENALE E PROCESSO |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Amministrazione giudiziaria
- Sequestro e confisca
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Execution of preventive seizure, judicial administration of assets and protection of third parties. An "endless" reform of art. 104 bis available att. cpp'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver