Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] It is a shared position, in jurisprudence, that according to which the chance must be "concrete and effective". What this really means, and how this concreteness must be evaluated, is not clear: the doubt is that - the reflections are conducted with particular regard to the casuistry in terms of medical responsibility - behind the request of a minimum concreteness that the chance should have in order for his loss to be compensable, there are, in reality, other kinds of needs, of a less "objective" nature.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Error or delay in diagnosis: how concrete should the lost chances be? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 269-277 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | RESPONSABILITÀ MEDICA |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- causalità
- chance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Error or delay in diagnosis: how concrete should the lost chances be?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver