Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review

A. Repici; Cesare Hassan; D. De Paula Pessoa; N. Pagano; A. Arezzo; A. Zullo; R. Lorenzetti; R. Marmo

doi:10.1055/s-0031-1291448

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review

A. Repici, Cesare Hassan, D. De Paula Pessoa, N. Pagano, A. Arezzo, A. Zullo, R. Lorenzetti, R. Marmo

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

184 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for large colorectal lesions, due to the high risk of recurrence following endoscopic mucosal resection. However, data on the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD are still controversial. The aim of the current systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	137-150
Number of pages	14
Journal	Endoscopy
Volume	44
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1291448
Publication status	Published - 2012
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Colorectal Neoplasms
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Humans
Intestinal Mucosa
Postoperative Complications
Treatment Outcome

Access to Document

10.1055/s-0031-1291448

Cite this

@article{2affa15149bd4747b39eb31bdf8ae68d,

title = "Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review",

abstract = "Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for large colorectal lesions, due to the high risk of recurrence following endoscopic mucosal resection. However, data on the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD are still controversial. The aim of the current systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD.",

keywords = "Colorectal Neoplasms, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Colorectal Neoplasms, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome",

author = "A. Repici and Cesare Hassan and {De Paula Pessoa}, D. and N. Pagano and A. Arezzo and A. Zullo and R. Lorenzetti and R. Marmo",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1055/s-0031-1291448",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "137--150",

journal = "Endoscopy",

issn = "1438-8812",

publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review

AU - Repici, A.

AU - Hassan, Cesare

AU - De Paula Pessoa, D.

AU - Pagano, N.

AU - Arezzo, A.

AU - Zullo, A.

AU - Lorenzetti, R.

AU - Marmo, R.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for large colorectal lesions, due to the high risk of recurrence following endoscopic mucosal resection. However, data on the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD are still controversial. The aim of the current systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD.

AB - Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for large colorectal lesions, due to the high risk of recurrence following endoscopic mucosal resection. However, data on the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD are still controversial. The aim of the current systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD.

KW - Colorectal Neoplasms

KW - Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal

KW - Humans

KW - Intestinal Mucosa

KW - Postoperative Complications

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Colorectal Neoplasms

KW - Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal

KW - Humans

KW - Intestinal Mucosa

KW - Postoperative Complications

KW - Treatment Outcome

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/35122

U2 - 10.1055/s-0031-1291448

DO - 10.1055/s-0031-1291448

M3 - Article

SN - 1438-8812

VL - 44

SP - 137

EP - 150

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

ER -

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this