TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of different free stall surfaces on behavioural, productive and metabolic parameters in dairy cows.
AU - Calamari, Luigi
AU - Calegari, Ferdinando
AU - Stefanini, L.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Two experiments were carried out on 56 lactating dairy cows in an experimental free stall
barn comparing four different lying surfaces: straw bedded pack (ST), rubber mat (RM),
mattress (MA) and sand (SA). In the first experiment (26 days) cows were allowed to
choose between free stalls with each lying surface. The rest area was filmed for three nonconsecutive
days to record the total duration of lying and standing in the free stalls with
each lying surface, and the duration and frequency of lying and standing bouts. In the
second experiment, lasting 50 days, the cows were divided into four groups; each one was
kept in a free stall pen with only one kind of lying surface. Milk yield was recorded and
individual blood and milk samples were collected. Blood metabolites and milk
characteristics of the samples were analyzed. During Experiment 1 the time spent lying
down in the free stalls was 631 min cow 1 day 1, and the cows spent more time lying on
SA (44.1% of the total lying time) and on ST (33.2%) than on RM (11.6%) and MA (11.1%)
(P < 0.001). The total number of lying bouts per day was greater (P < 0.001) on SA and ST
than on RM and MA, but there were no differences in the duration of lying bouts. On
average, free stalls with SA were occupied for 74.87% of the time, those with ST 60.4%, and
those with RM and MA 31.41% and 31.47% respectively. The free stalls with SA and ST were
mainly utilized to lie down (85.4% and 80% of the total time spent in these free stalls
respectively), while those with RM and MA weremainly utilized to stand (48.4% and 46.4%
of the total time spent in these free stalls respectively). Different milk yield change
patterns were observed during Experiment 2, with greater values at the end of the
experimental period in SA compared with RM (P < 0.001) and MA and ST (P < 0.05). In MA
greater plasma ceruloplasmin (cf.RM and SA; P < 0.05), greater plasma globulin (cf. RM, ST
and SA; P < 0.05) and lower plasma albumin (cf. ST; P < 0.05) were observed. Furthermore,
in MA lower milk protein content (cf. ST and SA; P < 0.05), with greater pH (cf. ST and SA;
P < 0.05) and lower titratable acidity (cf. ST; P < 0.05), were observed. In conclusion, our
results show that cows spent lying timemainly on the softer surfaces, either sand or straw
bedded pack, rather than mattress and rubber mat. It moreover seems that surface
characteristics that are desirable for lying (e.g. softness) may not be the properties of
surfaces most suitable for standing (e.g. stability). Finally, the results obtained with milk
yield, milk characteristics and blood metabolites indicate that sand seems to be the best
lying surface for dairy cows.
AB - Two experiments were carried out on 56 lactating dairy cows in an experimental free stall
barn comparing four different lying surfaces: straw bedded pack (ST), rubber mat (RM),
mattress (MA) and sand (SA). In the first experiment (26 days) cows were allowed to
choose between free stalls with each lying surface. The rest area was filmed for three nonconsecutive
days to record the total duration of lying and standing in the free stalls with
each lying surface, and the duration and frequency of lying and standing bouts. In the
second experiment, lasting 50 days, the cows were divided into four groups; each one was
kept in a free stall pen with only one kind of lying surface. Milk yield was recorded and
individual blood and milk samples were collected. Blood metabolites and milk
characteristics of the samples were analyzed. During Experiment 1 the time spent lying
down in the free stalls was 631 min cow 1 day 1, and the cows spent more time lying on
SA (44.1% of the total lying time) and on ST (33.2%) than on RM (11.6%) and MA (11.1%)
(P < 0.001). The total number of lying bouts per day was greater (P < 0.001) on SA and ST
than on RM and MA, but there were no differences in the duration of lying bouts. On
average, free stalls with SA were occupied for 74.87% of the time, those with ST 60.4%, and
those with RM and MA 31.41% and 31.47% respectively. The free stalls with SA and ST were
mainly utilized to lie down (85.4% and 80% of the total time spent in these free stalls
respectively), while those with RM and MA weremainly utilized to stand (48.4% and 46.4%
of the total time spent in these free stalls respectively). Different milk yield change
patterns were observed during Experiment 2, with greater values at the end of the
experimental period in SA compared with RM (P < 0.001) and MA and ST (P < 0.05). In MA
greater plasma ceruloplasmin (cf.RM and SA; P < 0.05), greater plasma globulin (cf. RM, ST
and SA; P < 0.05) and lower plasma albumin (cf. ST; P < 0.05) were observed. Furthermore,
in MA lower milk protein content (cf. ST and SA; P < 0.05), with greater pH (cf. ST and SA;
P < 0.05) and lower titratable acidity (cf. ST; P < 0.05), were observed. In conclusion, our
results show that cows spent lying timemainly on the softer surfaces, either sand or straw
bedded pack, rather than mattress and rubber mat. It moreover seems that surface
characteristics that are desirable for lying (e.g. softness) may not be the properties of
surfaces most suitable for standing (e.g. stability). Finally, the results obtained with milk
yield, milk characteristics and blood metabolites indicate that sand seems to be the best
lying surface for dairy cows.
KW - behaviour
KW - dairy cows
KW - free stall surfaces
KW - behaviour
KW - dairy cows
KW - free stall surfaces
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/22246
U2 - 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.05.013
M3 - Article
SN - 0168-1591
VL - 2009
SP - 9
EP - 17
JO - Applied Animal Behaviour Science
JF - Applied Animal Behaviour Science
ER -