Dopo le decisioni delle Sezioni Unite: le "reali" divergenze tra esistenzialisti ed antiesistenzialisti

[Autom. eng. transl.] THERE. analyzes the positions of doctrine and jurisprudence subsequent to the filing of the four decisions of 11 November 2008 which excluded compensation for existential damage as an autonomous category of non-pecuniary damage. THERE. note that, despite the fact that the United Sections have confirmed their fidelity to the principle of integral reparation of the damage and that therefore the existential consequences must also be repaired as long as they are a consequence of the invasion of an inviolable right, existentialist thought has not really distanced itself from the positions expressed up to 2008, proposing a reading of non-pecuniary damage inconsistent with the general functions of the civil offense.