Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Discrezionalità, sostenibilità, responsabilità nella giurisprudenza costituzionale sui diritti sociali

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Discretion, sustainability, responsibility in constitutional jurisprudence on social rights

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A survey of recent rulings by the Italian Constitutional Court on social rights, particularly regarding their coexistence with budget constraints, allows to formulate three general remarks: this case law is still centered around the notion of legislative discretion; consequently, not even in a difficult time of crisis has the Court adopted a rigid doctrine of financial rigor, nor have social rights ever been fully subordinated to budgetary discipline, as some feared; nevertheless, it is possible to detect the symptoms of a more intense and realistic attention of the Court for the economic dimension of policy choices, as well as their judicial review, whose outcome has been occasionally very critical towards ill-pondered austerity measures. The Court’s case law emphasizes both political discretion
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Discretion, sustainability, responsibility in constitutional jurisprudence on social rights
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)73-93
Number of pages24
JournalQuaderni Costituzionali
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Keywords

  • diritti sociali

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Discretion, sustainability, responsibility in constitutional jurisprudence on social rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this