Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The paper reflects on the irrelevance that the dimension of dialogue has traditionally assumed in criminal systems, which have conceived the search for truth exclusively to the detriment of the defendant. From such an orientation we analyze counterproductive aspects with respect to the objectives of prevention and the interest of the victims. This leads to indications for innovative models of criminal litigation management, in the wake of restorative justice and with specific attention to the profile of procedural guarantees.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Say something true after the crime: a relevant objective for the legal system? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 637-655 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | CRIMINALIA |
| Volume | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- giustizia penale e dialogo
- giustizia riparativa
- processo penale e verità
- vittime del reato
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Say something true after the crime: a relevant objective for the legal system?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver