Diritti fondamentali e dialogo tra le Corti: fantascienza giuridica?

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Fundamental rights and dialogue between the Courts: legal science fiction?

Giulio Ubertis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The initial classification of the theme highlights, among other things, the "constitutional nature" of human rights and the effectiveness beyond the case decided by the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights. They are therefore examined in the perspective of the dialogue between the Courts both the Prot. N. 15 and 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights that the revised draft of an agreement concerning the accession of the European Union to the same Convention. Finally, the prospects opened up by the future entry into force of these Protocols and the aforementioned Accession Agreement are illustrated.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Fundamental rights and dialogue between the Courts: legal science fiction?
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1723-1738
Number of pages16
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO E PROCEDURA PENALE
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea
  • Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo
  • Court of Justice of the European Union
  • Diritti umani
  • European Court of Human Rights
  • Human rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Fundamental rights and dialogue between the Courts: legal science fiction?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this