Diritti, conflitti, Costituzione: la giustizia penale della Consulta tra giudici comuni e legislatore

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Rights, conflicts, Constitution: the criminal justice of the Consulta between common judges and legislator

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] Penal legality seems to be going through a difficult time. The social and political reasons that are the cause of this are reflected in the legal discourse in particular in terms of sources, whose proliferation undermines the principle of legality. From the Constitutional Court to the European Courts, from the Cassation to the judges of merit, the criminal legality flows in a disorderly manner and becomes constitutional legality, conventional legality, judicial legality. If this phenomenon is to be curbed and in what terms is a question that still awaits an answer, especially in the face of that coincidence between legality and democracy that seemed to be an established and insuperable datum.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Rights, conflicts, Constitution: the criminal justice of the Consulta between common judges and legislator
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1253-1259
Number of pages7
JournalDIRITTO PENALE E PROCESSO
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Corte costituzionale
  • Fonti del diritto penale
  • Interpretazione conforme
  • Legalità penale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Rights, conflicts, Constitution: the criminal justice of the Consulta between common judges and legislator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this