Abstract
This paper focuses on deadlocks in Roman tragedy. More specifically, it argues for a pattern to be found in ending such conversations,
namely forced closings. The corpus has been analysed relying on a theoretical approach borrowed from Conversation Analysis (CA). A correlation is suggested between the characterisation of the speakers, struggling
for power and dominance, their ineptitude in handling interpersonal communication, and their linguistic choices when bringing to an end the ongoing conversation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 113-144 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Materiali e Discussioni per l'Analisi dei Testi Classici |
Volume | 84 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Conversation Analysis
- Roman Tragedy
- Seneca
- closings