Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Counterfactuals in the social context: The case of political interviews and their effects

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Politicians can use counterfactual communication to promote their own representations of past political events, to defend themselves, to attack their adversaries, and, more generally, to influence citizens’ representation of political reality and of politicians. In this chapter, we focus on two main questions: a) What counterfactuals do politicians use in discourse? b) What effects do these counterfactuals have on voters? In addressing these questions, we build on what previous psychological research has shown regarding counterfactual thinking and its relations with other psychological processes, such as causal reasoning, emotional reactions, and decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCounterfactual thinking-Counterfactual writing
Pages81-94
Number of pages14
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • counterfactual communication
  • counterfactual thinking
  • political communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Counterfactuals in the social context: The case of political interviews and their effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this