Abstract
The authors regret an inconsistency in the reported quality of evidence for Key Question 4 concerning whether neurosurgical aspiration or excision should be used in patients with brain abscess. The reported quality of evidence was described as “low” in the abstract and Table 1 and should instead be “moderate” as stated in the main text. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 698-698 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Clinical Microbiology and Infection |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Microbiology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases
Keywords
- brain abscess
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain abscess in children and adults” [Clin Microbiol and Infect 30(1) (2024 Jan) 66–89 Doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016] (Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2024) 30(1) (66–89), (S1198743X23003993), (10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver