Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Continuing Conflict and Stalemate: A Note

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This note is about the possibility of a stalemate in a continuing conflict. Following the prevailing economic literature on the topic, under some assumptions, the outcome of a conflict can be described in two ways: (i) a predetermined split of the contested output; (ii) a winner-take-all contest where the winning agent is capable to grab all the contested stake. By contrast, in reality many disputes do not have a clear or a definite outcome. A stalemate can end the conflict with the result of a draw. To allow for a stalemate some formal modifications to the classical Hirshleifer's model of conflict are needed. In particular, since the cornerstone of the economic literature on conflict is the Contest Success Function the possibility of a stalemate can be captured through a modified form of the CSF as axiomatized by Blavatskyy (2004). When a stalemate can emerge, results show that the scenario exhibits a higher degree of violence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalEconomics Bulletin
Publication statusPublished - 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • conflict
  • stalemate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuing Conflict and Stalemate: A Note'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this