Considerazioni a margine della sentenza Corte cost., 11 aprile 2023, n. 66: una battuta d’arresto nell’evoluzione della giurisprudenza costituzionale sul superamento degli automatismi sanzionatori?

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Considerations on the sidelines of the Constitutional Court ruling, 11 April 2023, n. 66: a setback in the evolution of constitutional jurisprudence on overcoming automatic sanctioning mechanisms?

Valeria Polimeni*

*Corresponding author

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The paper takes the Constitutional Court’s judgment n. 66/2023 as a starting point to develop some considerations on the need to continue the process of erosion of the presumptive sanctioning mechanisms in the context of highly serious offences. In particular, starting from the arguments developed by the Constitutional Court, which seems to interrupt this path in the case under consideration, some ideas are proposed for a redefinition of the assessment of the offender’s social dangerousness, so that it is no longer interpreted as a presumption of non rehabilitability of the offender, but as a broader judgment of his re-education needs, functional to a new method of balancing with the instances of social defence.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Considerations on the sidelines of the Constitutional Court ruling, 11 April 2023, n. 66: a setback in the evolution of constitutional jurisprudence on overcoming automatic sanctioning mechanisms?
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalArchivio Penale
Volume2023
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Liberazione condizionale
  • libertà vigilata
  • esclusione della revoca anticipata
  • applicazione obbligatoria
  • durata fissa
  • pericolosità sociale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Considerations on the sidelines of the Constitutional Court ruling, 11 April 2023, n. 66: a setback in the evolution of constitutional jurisprudence on overcoming automatic sanctioning mechanisms?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this