Conflitti morali ed etica della riconciliazione. Fra deliberazione e danno.

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Moral conflicts and ethics of reconciliation. Between deliberation and damage.

Paolo Monti

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The fact of pluralism in contemporary societies brings about the problem of potential conflict among differences and the need for strategies of reconciliation. Rawls and Habermas offer two articulate and influential strategies of reconciliation through public deliberation. These perspectives, however, both assume that reconciliation may happen by reducing the differences and finding consensus over shared public reasons. In these sense, they reflect a reductionist understanding of conflict, which focuses on the plurality of beliefs but does not address the moral damage that the clash between different views determines in the communities. The experiences of restorative justice offer, at a different level, some significant insights to address the problem of moral damage and open the way to a different ethics of reconciliation.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Moral conflicts and ethics of reconciliation. Between deliberation and damage.
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationI conflitti di valore nello spazio pubblico. Tra prossimità e distanza
EditorsLuigi Alici
Pages83-92
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NamePERCORSI DI ETICA. COLLOQUI

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Conflitto
  • Deliberative democracy
  • Democrazia deliberativa
  • Giustizia riparativa
  • Reconciliation
  • Restorative justice
  • Riconciliazione

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Moral conflicts and ethics of reconciliation. Between deliberation and damage.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this