[Autom. eng. transl.] The contribution questions the assumptions of relevance of the omissions of the injured party for the purpose of reducing the compensation, pursuant to art. 1227, paragraph 1, code civ. In particular, one wonders whether the legal obligation to prevent the harmful event, as a requirement of configurability of the omission causality, can arise only from identified sources (the rules or previous relationships, negotiated and otherwise, existing between the parties) or even from generic duties of diligence.
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] Wrongful negligence contest of the injured party: the almost inextricable intertwining between causality and guilt and the irruption on the field of solidarity|
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||LA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA|
|Publication status||Published - 2012|
- Concorso omissivo colposo