Abstract
The paper highlights how the interest in a non-reductive approach to the psychological
complexity of criminal conducts cannot be limited only to cases in which it makes possible to
exclude the sanity or, however, the guilt of the offender. Even in ordinary cases in which this does
not occur, therefore, the sanctioning modalities shall take into account this complexity, which can
only take place in the context of responses to the crime no longer conceived in a retributive sense,
but as a project: promoting, above all, sanctions with prescriptive nature.
It is also noted, in line with Daniele Piva's elaboration, that the studies on the impulsive components
of conduct and, in general, on the cerebral correlates of voluntary action are not at all able to solve
the mystery of human freedom in a deterministic sense. Rather, the impossibility of weighing
decision-making autonomy with respect to the factors affecting individual choices makes the
theoretical assumptions of a retributive concept of justice unsustainable.
Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Psychological complexity of human conduct and criminal sanctions system. Notes in the margin to D. Piva, The impulsive components of the conduct. Between imputability, (pre) guilt and punishment, Jovene, Naples, 2020 |
---|---|
Original language | Italian |
Pages (from-to) | 60-71 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | DIRITTO PENALE E UOMO |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- colpevolezza penale
- componenti impulsive del reato e modalità sanzionatorie
- libertà del volere
- psicologia delle condotte criminose