Comete, atomi, eucarestia. A quattrocento anni dalla pubblicazione del Saggiatore di Galileo

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Comets, atoms, eucharist. Four hundred years after the publication of the Saggiatore of Galileo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Published exactly four centuries ago, Galileo’s Il Saggiatore (1623) originated from a dispute with Jesuit mathematician Orazio Grassi over the nature and motion of comets that appeared in the second half of 1618. Il Saggiatore, however, is much more than a work on comets. In numerous long digressions, Galileo analyzes various physical phenomena, where he expounds, for example, his conception of the structure of matter, based on the distinction between primary and secondary qualities, and explains the corpuscular nature of heat. In this way, Galileo took the opportunity to present his new natural philosophy, which, through a rigorously mathematical (according to the famous image of the book of nature) and empirically grounded approach, was a viable alternative to the traditional Aristotelian-scholastic system. The paper also shows how the comet debate had obvious cosmological implications, with Galileo’s attempt to give new life to Copernicus’ heliocentric theory, and emphasizes that Galileo ascribed to his comet theory not a value of absolute truth, but a hypothesis that could explain observational data.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Comets, atoms, eucharist. Four hundred years after the publication of the Saggiatore of Galileo
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)269-286
Number of pages18
JournalIntersezioni
VolumeXLIII
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Comet theory, Hypothesis vs absolute truth, Structure of matter, Primary and secondary qualities, Book of nature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Comets, atoms, eucharist. Four hundred years after the publication of the Saggiatore of Galileo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this